- Sources: HN discussion
- Summary: The Hacker News thread on Wafer's Kimi K3 on MI355X write-up disputes the post's performance-per-dollar claim. HN commenters read the post's own comparison table as favouring the B300 on every row except the GPU-hour rental rate the post selected. The 2026-08-02 digest carried the throughput figures from that post without the thread.
- Why it matters: The disputed number is the one a capacity decision would rest on, and the counterargument uses the vendor's own table rather than an independent benchmark.
send feedback on this story